Labels

ACLU (2) ACORN (1) Afghanistan (4) apologies (2) auto bailout (3) auto emissions (1) bailout bonuses (1) bailouts (1) beer summit (1) black panthers (1) Bo (1) Cabinet (1) California (1) cap and trade (2) capitalism (1) car design (1) cash for clunkers (1) celebrities (1) census (1) Christmas (1) class warfare (1) classic remakes (1) climate change (15) comedian bias (1) communism (1) Constitution (1) corruption (3) czars (1) DHS Secretary Napolitano (1) discrimination (1) disparate impact (1) earmarks (2) economic forecasts (1) economy (6) egotism (56) elections (2) elitism (6) eric holder (1) federal budget (10) federal regulations (3) federal spending (40) foreign policy (6) Founding Principles (7) free enterprise (5) free speech (13) freedom (3) freedom of association (1) frivolous lawsuits (1) Geithner (3) global warming (39) government arts funding (2) green jobs (3) Guantanamo Bay closing (2) Guantanamo Bay detainees (4) Gulf oil spill (4) Halloween (1) hate crimes (1) headlines (12) health care (88) holdren (1) hope (1) illegal immigration (6) inexperience (1) inflation (1) intelligence (1) interrogation policy (3) Iran (5) Iraq (1) Joe Biden (2) judicial activism (3) lame duck (1) lawyers (2) legal reform (1) Libya (1) limited government (1) lobbyists (1) media bias (13) miranda warnings (1) mortgage crisis (5) Nanny State (1) national debt (10) National Endowment for the Arts (2) national security (50) net neutrality (1) North Korea (1) nuclear threat (2) Olympics (2) Pelosi (1) personal responsibility (8) photo ops (1) pledge drives (1) political correctness (3) politically correct terminology (3) politics (2) press manipulation (2) privacy (1) public sector (2) racial preferences (1) racism (4) Rangel (2) regulation (5) rendition (1) responsibility (1) school vouchers (1) Second Amendment (3) Senate Majority Leader Reid (2) senior citizens (1) smoking (5) social security (1) Speaker Pelosi (10) straw man arguments (1) Supreme Court (10) surveillance (1) t-shirt design (3) taxes (11) Tea Party (2) teleprompter (2) terrorists (1) Thanksgiving (2) transparency (6) unemployment (10) VAT tax (1) welfare reform (1)

Search This Blog

Loading...

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Authorities Uncover Supreme Court Fetish Club

Washington, D.C.--Just days after the House of Representatives' first-ever public reading of the U.S. Constitution led detractors to say the event showed Republicans' reverence for the nation's founding document was a "fetish," those same detractors were found at the Supreme Court, on their knees, enjoying a domination routine run by the most left-wing Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Authorities said they were called to the scene when passers-by heard cries of "Work your will on us, harder, harder!" as prominent advocates of the judiciary's governmental supremacy begged several of the unelected, lifetime-tenured Justices to impose their own policy preferences on them through a variety of sick and twisted distortions of the constitutional text.

Some of the participants defended their involvement in the Supreme Court fetish club, saying they were just trying to work out some "intimacy issues" with their democratic form of government.

Associated articles: National Review; Wall Street Journal; AOL

Blog Archive